Published on 2025年4月3日
Data quality is a critical facet of AI through every phase of its development. It encompasses dimensions like accuracy, completeness, consistency, and timeliness.
Yet AI leaders must move beyond the simplistic assumption that "high-quality AI demands high-quality data." Instead, as defined by Gartner, AI-ready data must represent the specific use case, capturing relevant patterns, errors, outliers, and unexpected occurrences essential for training or operating the AI model. AI-ready data is a continual practice relying on comprehensive metadata to align, qualify, and govern data effectively. Gartner describes AI-ready data as data whose fitness for AI use cases is demonstrable, emphasizing the importance of use-case specificity and accurate representation, including anomalies and trends.
Consider a financial institution training an AI model to detect fraudulent transactions. If the dataset includes only clean, error-free transactions, the AI might miss real fraud patterns involving anomalies or incomplete records. Metadata capturing historical fraud, outliers, and data lineage enables data scientists to refine the model effectively, improving its real-world accuracy and reliability. This is one case of many in which “high-quality data” would actually be inappropriate for model training.
The quality of data directly influences AI models' performance, accuracy, and reliability. Appropriate data quality ensures efficient and fair AI systems, critical for organizational effectiveness. Evaluating data quality involves assessing metrics such as reliability, accuracy, validity, completeness, consistency, timeliness, duplication, and uniqueness.
Organizations seeking to leverage AI for internal processes or customer-facing products must prioritize data quality, as inaccurate or inconsistent data can lead to flawed predictions. A proactive approach involves assessing data measures before deploying changes to production environments. ML and AI technologies significantly enhance data quality management, automating data validation, deduplication, and anomaly detection, crucial given widespread organizational distrust in data quality.
Integrating data quality into formal governance frameworks ensures ethical standards, mitigating bias and promoting fairness in AI outcomes. Effective governance policies must include automated quality checks to minimize biased outcomes. Clearly defined data ownership helps prevent departmental silos and inconsistencies in governance.
Organizations encounter challenges like managing data volume complexity, resistance to change, and rapid technological evolution. Collaboration across departments is essential to address these challenges effectively, maintaining compliance and proactively addressing ethical data management issues.
Data governance and data quality are closely linked. Data governance establishes the policies, roles, and standards for how data should be managed across an organization. Data quality, on the other hand, measures how accurate, complete, consistent, and reliable the data actually is. Good data governance ensures clear responsibilities and processes, leading to higher data quality. In turn, higher-quality data makes governance efforts more effective, enabling better decisions and stronger trust in organizational data.
Today, data governance frameworks can incorporate automated quality checks such as data validation, deduplication, and anomaly detection, essential for high-quality AI model inputs. Effective data governance clarifies data ownership, ensuring structured data management and operational trust.
Ambiguities in data responsibility can result in departmental silos. Promoting cross-functional collaboration and communication enhances data stewardship, improving the effectiveness of enterprise AI models. Data stewards must continuously adapt governance policies to ensure compliance and proactively address data stewardship issues.
AI teams should embrace collaboration across diverse expertise beyond purely technical roles. Wendy Turner-Williams is the founder of TheAssociation.AI, a nonprofit business association for AI leaders. She emphasizes that AI requires bringing various disciplines together to create communities, drive conversations, crowdsource knowledge, and establish technical implementation standards. She notes, "You can't take a siloed approach to AI. We have to bring these different disciplines together to have end-to-end conversations about our deep expertise and subject areas and the touchpoints, to really enable trust and ethics scenarios."
Turner-Williams provides an example in healthcare, where The Association convenes practitioners, software providers, hospital representatives, freelance doctors, and professional groups to collaboratively define what ethical AI looks like in practice. She highlights that detailed recommendations vary depending on the organization's size and focus, such as a small doctor's office versus a major DNA-focused company like 23andMe.
This collaborative approach is essential given the complexity of upcoming regulations and user-driven configurations. Turner-Williams points out that upcoming data regulations will require nuanced data management approaches, clearly defining data ownership, retention policies, and granular user permissions. Addressing these complexities effectively demands cross-functional collaboration, integrating perspectives from privacy, cybersecurity, data governance, legal, and user experience experts. All told, data quality encompasses how data was sourced, organized, transformed, and used, which is a nuanced story. It is incumbent on AI leaders to include those best positioned to share context of that story if they wish for their efforts to be successful.
AI leaders should monitor specific data quality metrics, insofar as they relate to their AI use case:
Accuracy: Correctness of data reflecting real-world scenarios.
Completeness: Availability of all required data elements.
Consistency: Uniformity of data across various sources.
Timeliness: Availability and currency of data.
Validity: Data adherence to defined formats and standards.
Uniqueness: Absence of duplicate records.
Relevance: Applicability of data to specific AI use cases.
Integrity: Structural accuracy and consistency of data relationships.
Monitoring these metrics provides a comprehensive view of data health, identifying issues that could compromise AI model performance.
A data catalog significantly enhances data quality management by providing comprehensive visibility and governance over critical data assets. Alation Data Quality (DQ), an AI-native solution integrated within the Alation Data Intelligence Platform, exemplifies this approach. Alation DQ leverages metadata-driven insights and automated quality rules to identify, prioritize, and proactively monitor data quality issues at an enterprise scale.
Specifically, Alation addresses major data quality challenges by prioritizing high-value data assets based on usage frequency and business context, reducing alert fatigue, and embedding real-time data quality signals directly within workflows. By integrating governance, data lineage tracking, and automated quality checks into one unified system, Alation helps organizations proactively detect and resolve issues, enhancing trust in data.
Ultimately, data catalogs like Alation ensure that data quality becomes an inherent part of an organization's broader data governance strategy, enabling reliable, high-quality data to support AI initiatives.
Enterprise AI initiatives demand data quality tailored to specific use cases. By ensuring datasets accurately represent the targeted applications—including anomalies and trends—and diligently monitoring critical data quality metrics, organizations significantly enhance the accuracy, reliability, and ethical integrity of their AI models. This comprehensive approach builds confidence in AI-driven outcomes, driving sustained business value.
Curious to learn how a data catalog can help you manage data quality for AI success? Book a demo with us today.